|
The following are questions
with answers taken from various Wikipedia articles. This is
to highlight some relevant points on the subject—"The Origin
And Formulation Of The Trinity Doctrine"—which people should
understand before continuing the bible study. The answers
are excerpt taken from the full articles written on the
subject. You can readily study the full articles written on
the subject by clicking on the source link after each
answer. Note: The answers to the following religious
questions are taken from various Wikipedia articles due to
their neutral point of view principle.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view
However, it is still highly recommend that you search the
internet for more information on the subject.
___________
From the last Lesson-3E, we've studied that many people refuse to believe the Trinity simply because it lacks direct scriptural support or simply not taught or found in the Bible as proven by the declaration of some encyclopedias and Bible dictionaries. They also contend that the the Trinitarian explanation that the "Trinity doctrine is a mystery" is
essentially an inherent irrationality. The perplexity of the Trinitarian arguments, which has included the use of philosophy, is contrary to the Biblical principles of simplicity and clarity in doctrine (Lesson-2E.3).
Nontrinitarians also take the position that the doctrine of the earliest form of Christianity is "not Trinitarian" as this was the belief during the Apostolic Age (c 26-100). that is
traditionally the
period of the Twelve
Apostles, dating
from the Crucifixion
of Jesus (c. 26–36)
and the Great
Commission until the
death of John the
Apostle (c. 100).
Nontrinitarians also believe Christianity was altered as a direct and indirect consequence of the edicts of Emperor Constantine I, which resulted in the eventual adoption of Trinitarian Christianity as the official religion of the Roman Empire. Let us continue our study so we may come to know the truth about the origin and formulation of the Trinity doctrine based on references that are readily available in the internet.
2F.1 Who was credited with
using the word "Trinity" , "person", and "substance" to
explain that the Father, Son and Holy Spirit are "one in
essence—not one in Person"?
From the Wikipedia
article- Trinity, these are written:
Etymology
The English word
Trinity is derived from Latin Trinitas,
meaning "the number three, a triad".[13]
This abstract noun is formed from the adjective
trinus (three each, threefold, triple),[14]
as the word unitas is the abstract noun
formed from unus (one)
The corresponding word in Greek is
Τριάς,
meaning "a set of three" or "the number three".[15]
Tertullian, a Latin theologian who wrote in the
early third century, is credited with using the
words "Trinity",[19]
"person" and "substance"[20]
to explain that the Father, Son and Holy Spirit are
"one in essence—not one in Person".[21]
About a century later, in 325,
the First Council of Nicaea established the doctrine
of the Trinity as orthodoxy and adopted the Nicene
Creed, which described Christ as "God of God, Light
of Light, very God of very God, begotten, not made,
being of one substance (homoousios) with the
Father".
Source:
Wikipedia,
Trinity,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trinity
(as of Feb.
10, 2010, 06:01 GMT).
The origin of the word
Trinity was Tertullian, a Latin
theologian who wrote in the early third century, is
credited with using the words "Trinity", "person" and
"substance" to explain that the Father, Son and Holy
Spirit are "one in essence—not one in Person".
2F.2
How did the doctrine of the Trinity
came to be, if it is not explicitly stated and explained in
detail in the Old and New Testament of the Holy Bible?
The following excerpts
from Wikipedia articles are being presented to highlight
some historical facts that are relevant to the origin
and formulation of the doctrine of the Trinity:
From the Wikipedia article
on the Arius, these are written:
The Arian controversy
Arius is notable primarily because of his
role in the Arian controversy, a great
fourth-century theological conflict that rocked the
Christian world and led to the calling of the first
ecumenical council of the Church. This controversy
centered upon the nature of the Son of God, and his
precise relationship to God the Father.
Beginnings
The historian
Socrates of Constantinople
reports that Arius ignited the controversy that
bears his name when St. Alexander of Alexandria, who
had succeeded Achillas as the Bishop of Alexandria,
gave a sermon on the similarity of the Son to the
Father. Arius interpreted Alexander's speech as
being a revival of Sabellanism, condemned it, and
then argued that "if the Father begat the Son, he
that was begotten had a beginning of existence: and
from this it is evident, that there was a time when
the Son was not. It therefore necessarily follows,
that he [the Son] had his substance from
nothing.
[7]
This quote describes the essence of Arius' doctrine.
Although "Arianism" suggests
that Arius was the originator of the teaching that
bears his name, the debate over the Son’s precise
relationship to the Father did not begin with
him. This subject had been discussed for decades
before his advent; Arius merely intensified the
controversy and carried it to a Church-wide
audience, where other "Arians" such as Eusebius of
Nicomedia and Eusebius of Caesarea would prove much
more influential in the long run. In fact, some
later "Arians" disavowed that moniker, claiming not
to have been familiar with the man or his specific
teachings.[1]
However, because the conflict between Arius and his
opponents brought the issue to the theological
forefront, the doctrine he proclaimed—though not
originated by him—is generally labeled as "his".
Source: Wikipedia, Arius,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arius (as of
Feb. 12, 2010, 00:04 GMT).
From the Wikipedia article
on the First
Council of Nicaea, these are written:
The
First Council of Nicaea
was a council of Christian bishops convened in
Nicaea
in Bithynia (present-day
İznik in Turkey) by the
Roman Emperor
Constantine I
in
A.D.
325. The Council was the first effort to attain
consensus in the church through an assembly representing
all of Christendom.[2]
Its main accomplishments were
settlement of the Christological issue of the
relationship of Jesus to God the Father; the
construction of the first part of the Nicene Creed;
settling the calculation of the date of Easter; and
promulgation of early canon law.[3][4]
Source:
Wikipedia, First Council of
Nicaea,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Council_of_Nicaea
(as of Dec. 27, 2010, 19:23 GMT).
From the Wikipedia article
on the Trinity, these are written:
Origin of the formula
In 325, the Council of Nicaea adopted a term
for the relationship between the Son and the
Father that from then on was seen as the
hallmark of orthodoxy; it declared that the
Son is "of the same substance" (ὁμοούσιος)
as the Father. This was further developed
into the formula "three persons, one
substance". The answer to the question "What
is God?" indicates the one-ness of the
divine nature, while the answer to the
question "Who is God?" indicates the
three-ness of "Father, Son and Holy Spirit".[63]
The Confession of the
Council of Nicaea said little about the Holy
Spirit.[62]
The doctrine of the divinity and personality
of the Holy Spirit was developed by
Athanasius (c 293–373)
in the last
decades of his life.[67]
He both defended and refined the Nicene
formula.[62]
By the end of the 4th century, under the
leadership of Basil of Caesarea, Gregory of
Nyssa, and Gregory of Nazianzus (the
Cappadocian Fathers), the doctrine had
reached substantially its current form.[62]
Source:
Wikipedia,
Trinity,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trinity
(as
of Feb. 10, 2010, 06:01 GMT).
From the Wikipedia
article on the
Nicene Creed, these are written:
The original Nicene
Creed was first adopted in 325 at the First
Council of Nicaea. At that time, the text
ended after the words "We believe in the
Holy Spirit", after which an anathema was
added.[8]
It is traditionally believed that the Second
Ecumenical Council held in Constantinople in
381 added the section that follows the words
"We believe in the Holy Spirit" (without the
words "and the Son" relative to the
procession of the Spirit);[9]
hence the name "Niceno-Constantinopolitan
Creed", referring to the Creed as modified
in the First Council of Constantinople.
History
The Nicene Creed of 325 explicitly affirms
the
divinity of Jesus, applying to him the
term "God". The 381 version speaks of the
Holy Spirit as worshipped and glorified with
the Father and the Son. The Athanasian Creed
describes in much greater detail the
relationship between Father, Son and Holy
Spirit. The Apostles' Creed makes no
explicit statements about the divinity of
the Son and the Holy Spirit, but, in the
view of many who use it, the doctrine is
implicit in it.
Source: Wikipedia, Nicene Creed,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicene_Creed
(as of Feb. 10, 2010, 05:04 GMT)
From the Wikipedia
article on the
First Council of
Constantinople, these are written:
The
First Council of
Constantinople
is recognized as the
Second Ecumenical
Council
by the Assyrian Church of the East, the
Oriental Orthodox,
the
Eastern Orthodox,
the
Roman Catholics,
the
Old Catholics,
and a number of other
Western Christian
groups. This being the first Ecumenical
Council held in Constantinople, it was
called by Theodosius I in 381[1][2]
which confirmed the Nicene Creed and dealt
with other matters such as Arian
controversy. The council took place in the
church of Hagia Irene from May to July 381.
Background
The Council
of Nicaea did not end the Arian controversy
which it had been called to clarify. By 327,
Emperor Constantine
I had begun to regret
the decisions that had been made at the
Nicene Council. He granted amnesty to the
Arian leaders and exiled Athanasius because
of Eusebius of Nicomedia.
Up until about 360, theological debates
mainly dealt with the Divinity of Jesus, the
2nd person of the Trinity. However, because
the Council of Nicaea had not clarified the
divinity of the Holy Spirit, the 3rd person
of the Trinity, it became a topic of debate.
The Macedonians denied the divinity of the
Holy Spirit. This was also known as Pneumatomachianism.
The proceedings
The council
affirmed the original Nicene creed of faith
as true and an accurate explanation of
Scripture. This council also developed a
statement of faith which included the
language of Nicaea, but expanded the
discussion on the Holy Spirit to combat the
heresy of the Pneumatomachi. It is called
the Nicene Creed of 381 and was a commentary
on the original Nicene formula. It expanded
the third article of the creed dealing with
the Holy Spirit, as well as some other
changes. About the Holy Spirit the article
of faith said he is "the Lord, the Giver of
Life, Who
proceeds from the Father, With the
Father and the Son he is worshipped and
glorified". The statement of proceeding from
the Father is seen as significant because it
established that the Holy Spirit must be of
the same being (ousia) as God the Father.
This Council's
decision regarding the Holy Spirit also gave
official endorsement
to the concept of the
Trinity. By the end of the 4th century, the
Byzantine Emperor Theodosius "issued a
decree that the doctrine of the Trinity was
to be the official state religion and that
all subjects shall adhere to it".
Source: Wikipedia, First
Council of Constantinople,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Council_of_Constantinople
(as of Feb. 10, 2010, 10:24 GMT).
-
THE USE OF THE WORD "TRINITY" (Early
Third Century):
-
The
word "Trinity" was first used by
Tertullian
in the early third
century, that is after 200 AD
-
John the Apostle died
in about 100 AD, he was the last surviving
of the Twelve Apostles, the only one to die a
natural death and died around the age of 94.
THUS, it took more than 100 years
after the death of the last apostle
when the word Trinity was first used.
Please
Note: 1st century is years 1 to 100, 2nd
century is 101 to 200, 3rd century
is 201 to 300 and 4th century is 301
to 400
-
THE GREAT CONTROVERSY (Early Fourth
Century):
- The
Arian
controversy came to exist
after the death of the Apostles. In
the early fourth century, a great
theological conflict rock the
Christian world. This controversy
centered upon the nature of the Son
of God, and his precise relationship
to God the Father.
- The
debate over the Son’s precise
relationship to the Father did not
begin with Arius. This subject had
been discussed for decades before
his advent; Arius merely intensified
the controversy and carried it to a
Church-wide audience.
THUS, it is right to say that this
great controversy came to existence
after the death of the Apostles.
-
THE
COUNCIL OF NICAEA IN 325 AD:
- The
above Great Controversy led to the
calling of the first ecumenical
council of the Church in Nicaea in
325 AD. The
First Council of Nicaea
was a council of Christian bishops
convened in
Nicaea
in Bithynia (present-day
İznik
in Turkey) by the
Roman Emperor
Constantine I
in
A.D.
325.
- The
First Council of Nicaea established
the doctrine of the Trinity and
adopted the
Nicene Creed, which
described Christ as "God of God,
Light of Light, very God of very
God, begotten, not made, being of
one substance with the Father".
-
THE DIVINITY OF JESUS
(325 AD):
For the time the Church through the
Nicene Creed of 325 explicitly
affirms the divinity of Jesus,
applying to him the term "God".
Thus, it was only in 325 AD that the
Church declared the divinity of
Jesus and call him God.
- But,
the Council of Nicaea said little
about the Holy Spirit. The Council
of Nicaea said nothing about the
divinity of the Holy Spirit.
Thus, by the year 325 AD the
divinity of the Holy Spirit was not
clear and not yet declared.
-
THE GREAT
CONTROVERSY CONTINUES:
- The
Council of Nicaea did not end the
Arian controversy which it had been
called to clarify.
-
Up until about 360, theological
debates mainly dealt with the
Divinity of Jesus, the 2nd
person of the Trinity.
-
Because the Council of Nicaea
had not clarified the divinity
of the Holy Spirit, the 3rd
person of the Trinity, it also
became a topic of debate.
-
The doctrine of the divinity
and personality of the Holy
Spirit was developed by
Athanasius (c 293–373)
in
the last decades of his life.
-
FIRST COUNCIL OF CONSTANTINOPLE IN 381:
- The
Council of Constantinople in 381 was
called to finally settle the great
controversy regarding the divinity
of Jesus, the 2nd person of the
Trinity and divinity of the Holy
Spirit, the 3rd person of the
Trinity.
-
This council also developed a
statement of faith which
included the language of Nicaea,
but expanded the discussion on
the Holy Spirit.
-
It expanded the third article of
the creed dealing with the Holy
Spirit, as well as some other
changes. About the Holy Spirit
the article of faith said he is
"the Lord, the Giver of Life,
Who proceeds from the Father,
With the Father and the Son he
is worshipped and glorified".
-
THE DIVINITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT
(381 AD):
-
The statement of
proceeding from
the Father is seen as
significant because it
established that the Holy Spirit
must be of the same being as God
the Father.
Thus it is clear that it took
the Church 56 years after Jesus
was declared God, that is in the
year 381, that the Church
Council also declared that the
Holy Spirit is also God.
-
THE OFFICIAL ENDORSEMENT OF THE TRINITY
DOCTRINE:
- This
Council's decision regarding the
Holy Spirit also gave
official
endorsement to the concept of the
Trinity. By the end of the 4th
century, the Byzantine Emperor
Theodosius "issued a decree that the
doctrine of the Trinity was to be
the official state religion and that
all subjects shall adhere to it"
THUS, It took about 300
years (after the death of the last apostle) for the Roman
Church to give official endorsement to the concept of
the Trinity. When the Church through the Council of
Constantinople in 381 AD gave its decision regarding the
divinity of the Holy Spirit, it also gave official
endorsement to the concept of the Trinity. Thus, by the
end of the 4th
century, the Emperor Theodosius "issued a decree that
the doctrine of the Trinity was to be the official state
religion of the Roman Empire and that all
subjects shall adhere to it".
_____________________
|
|
|